The abortion industry, their supporters, and their pet politicians will do anything to push abortion on Americans. Sadly, this usually involves manipulation, abusing the court system, and good, old-fashioned fibbing. Their latest attempt in the Peach State, however, maybe should have employed some fibbing, because the truth of what they did is just plain embarrassing.  

In a May 4^th, 2025 article entitled Survey: Georgia OB-GYNs say state abortion law risks mothers’ health, the pro-abortion American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) partnered with (also pro-abortion) Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff to conduct a survey intended to demonize Georgia’s abortion law which prohibits killing preborn babies after their heartbeats can be detected via ultrasound. 

In reading the headline alone, the premise is fair – everyone on both sides of the aisle should want to explore scenarios where mothers are in danger. But in a folly that is laughable to any person even remotely knowledgeable about statistics, their house of cards falls apart literally in the first line.  

A survey of 38 people is about as useful as a wet towel in a thunderstorm. It’s barely enough people to fill a room. The popular survey tool Survicate notes:  

“Many statisticians concur that a sample size of 100 is the minimum you need for meaningful results. If your population is smaller than that, you should aim to survey all of the members. The same source states that the maximum number of respondents should be 10% of your population, but it should not exceed 1000.” 

Let’s help our pro-abortion pals with the data, even though it’s way too late to spare them the shame. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are about 980 OB-GYNs employed in the state of Georgia. For some reason, ACOG and Senator Ossoff opted to only approach 3.8% of them to try to make their case. And of those 3.8%, not even half had anything useful to report. So, according to them, about 1.5% of all Georgia OB-GYNs feel the state’s pro-life law is ‘dangerous to women.’  

This next part is conjecture, but it also likely stands to reason that the surveyors intentionally sought out abortion-friendly providers to try to slant the data and still couldn’t pull together a compelling report. Or even one that didn’t make us laugh aloud. 

But what starts as a chuckle quickly morphs into an eye roll as the statistically insignificant premise is stubbornly used to make the tired case that Georgia’s Heartbeat Law is just too darn confusing for the state’s doctors to figure out. The article quotes an OB-GYN who gripes about the hardships of treating pregnant women without the option of deliberately killing their babies. The illusion here is twofold.  

FIRST: The quoted doctor is in an extreme minority. 93% of practicing OB-GYNs do not even commit abortions, instead staying in their lane and treating both parties as patients. And, as exhaustively stated, she’s part of a pitifully small sample size in her state. 

SECOND: Abortion, the deliberate destruction of a gestating human being, is never medically necessary. Georgia has had pro-life protections in place for years and, as Claire Bartlett, executive director of Georgia Life Alliance put it, “The medical community should be very well-informed at this point in time. With all due respect and high regard for our medical providers, if they are not informed by now, it comes across as political or willful.” 

It’s a self-deprecating attempt to stump for abortion, to assert that you’re simply not intelligent enough to practice non-violent medicine. 

Watch Kristan Hawkins explain why abortion is never medically necessary. 

Poking fun at this story is, in fact, fun. But even one legitimate case of a mother in Georgia in harm’s way due to the incompetence of a doctor is one too many. Pro-life advocates and abortion supporters alike should be unified in demanding a medical community that expertly and non-politically works to save as many human lives as possible in the face of a crisis. In the meantime, abortion friendlies in Georgia are going to have to try a little harder to convince us that the law preventing the deaths of babies with heartbeats is bad. 

READ NEXT: IVF Industry EXPOSED: NBC Reports 300 Nightmare Lawsuits