This Case, In a Nutshell    “This case encompasses two key issues. First, it addresses whether a provision in the Medicaid Act entitles the beneficiary to choose any medical provider; second, if a Medicaid beneficiary can pick a provider that has been disqualified by the state.     While the state of South Carolina does not want abortion funding in their healthcare programs,

It’s a new year, with court cases from 2024 and 2024 announcements for 2025 cases. And yes, the pro-life movement has a stake in them.   Here are the legal actions and plans the Pro-Life Generation (PLG) can look forward to in 2025, thanks to the groundwork laid in 2024, and how these cases can impact preborn children, children already born,

In case you hadn’t heard, when then-President Donald Trump appointed three Supreme Court Justices to the high court after vacancies naturally opened up during his administration, justices who had read the Constitution and who cared about what it said stated the obvious: Abortion is NOT in the fine print. And the tyranny of Roe v. Wade came to an end

The ink is hardly dry on the temporary EMTALA SCOTUS decision when the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary and “Evil Mastermind for Abortion in Chief” Xavier Becerra along with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sent a reminder letter to Idaho to perform “emergency” abortions or else they’ll take their money.   READ: President Trump & GOP: Abortion

“The Supreme Court’s decision that the conscience rights of the pro-life doctors would not be enough to stop Chemical Abortion Pills is not the end of this case,” said Students for Life of America’s Kristan Hawkins. “The Biden Administration allowed distribution of Chemical Abortion Pills in a way that exposes women to injury, infertility, and death, as well as empowers

Students for Life of America (SFLA) was involved with three U.S. Supreme Court cases in 2024 due to its connection to abortion, whether agency involvement is direct or indirect.   READ: Keep An Eye on the Supreme Court: Three Cases SFLA Has Filed Briefs in & Pro-Lifers Need to Watch All the cases have big-picture implications for how agencies operate, specifically

  The Pro-Life Generation knows how monumental the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health case is in taking a legal swing at Roe v. Wade. That’s why students and team members literally camped out in front of the Supreme Court overnight on November 30th in preparation for the December 1st hearing day for Dobbs. The following is SFLA President Kristan Hawkins’s address on hearing day… Good Morning

  Just yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center. The entire pro-life movement is very focused right now on another upcoming abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, but this Cameron case is not insignificant. That is why our team went to the Supreme Court to rally in support. Here’s what you need to know

  Yesterday, Students for Life of America rallied in front of the Supreme Court as hearings began for the Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center case out of Kentucky. Read more in our press release here.  The importance of this case is two-fold. In 2018, Kentucky’s government passed H.B. 454, which banned the violent second trimester dismemberment abortion. We know that

Students for Life is countering at least 25 national Women’s Marches on October 2nd, 2021.   Click here to sign up to participate.    The Women’s March is self-described as “a women-led movement providing intersectional education on a diverse range of issues.”  Unfortunately, one of their primary tenets is promoting & celebrating abortion. Under their “Unity Principles,” abortion support is