
The fallout from the impact of illegal immigration and the Biden-Harris open border policy has had an impact throughout society, perhaps even extending to Chemical Abortion Pills. If that seems like a stretch, check out the coverage of a federal court ruling and its implications for legal action that addresses abortion water pollution.

FOX: Forget gas stoves. The big polluter is in Biden’s backyard
Recently, a federal judge found that an Arizona rancher had been harmed – environmentally – as a result of the Biden-Harris border policies. FOX reported that “a southern border rancher who had argued that the Biden administration had violated environmental law in its ‘haste to reverse its predecessor’s border policies’” had made a case for real injury.
The story continues: “An Arizona rancher, Steven Smith, was part of the lawsuit, Massachusetts Coalition for Immigration Reform et al. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, challenging the Biden administration. The suit claimed that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had failed to conduct a mandatory review required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) before halting border wall construction, a key Trump-era project.”
Here’s the kicker (still at FOX):
“Under NEPA, a federal agency must conduct an Environmental Assessment to determine whether a federal action has the potential to cause significant effects on the human environment, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (EMPHASIS ADDED)
“After a two-day bench trial, Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling on Friday that Smith ‘suffered concrete and particularized injuries’ as a result of DHS not meeting the requirements of NEPA.
Why does that matter?
Students for Life of America (SFLA) has filed multiple citizen petitions with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), noting that environmental testing and assessments were not done by the federal government when it comes to Chemical Abortion Pills … not when the pills first went on the market and not as Democratic Party presidents made it easier and easier to sell them through policy changes.

In fact, SFLA filed an amicus brief in the FDA case that looked at the dangers of Chemical Abortion Pills, never addressed for endangered species that can be exposed to the deadly concoction as chemically tainted blood, placenta tissue, and human remains are flushed into America’s wastewater system all over the country.
Clean water matters … in fact it mattered in the Arizona rancher’s case too.
Students for Life Action has been highlighting potential agency misdeeds and neglect of Chemical Abortion Pill policy, calling on the FDA and EPA to do their jobs to protect women, the preborn, and everyone else who needs clean water. So far, the Biden-Harris Administration has stonewalled the requests for information and action.
But … Democratic Party Presidents – Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden (whose Vice President Kamala Harris stood silently by) – have fast-tracked and pushed these pills despite known risks to women and the preborn, and without checking for environmental harms for YEARS.
Legal action is clearly on the horizon. And with wins like this—along with the BIG win in the downfall of a legal doctrine known as Chevron—the power of agencies is diminished.

Chevron was a legal principle that held that agencies deserve the benefit of the doubt, making agency decisions de facto laws. But Chevron lost at the Supreme Court. That means that Chemical Abortion Pill policy can be revisited in a friendlier legal environment.
It’s all about the environment these days – and rancher along with pro-lifers are fighting for a win.
Share this post
Recent Posts

The FACE Act Farce: Pro-Abortion Aggressor Gets Convicted by a STATE, One More Reason to Repeal the FACE Act
10 Feb 2025
Maternal Mortality Rate Who? After Roe’s Reversal, CDC’s 2023 Report Reveals DECREASE in Maternal Death
07 Feb 2025
Movie Review of a “Better Man”: A Film’s Big Step in Showing Abortion’s Toll on the Heart
07 Feb 2025