“If you’re unclear whether abortion is a federal AND state issue, today’s hearing at the Supreme Court should remove all doubt,” said Students for Life Action’s Savanna Deretich. “Pregnancy is not a disease cured by abortion, and this offensive attack on state’s rights shows that Joe Biden’s team will abuse any program to ensure more die by intentional abortion.” MEDIA ALERT:

Amidst the shouting, chanting, middle fingers, Plan B handouts, chemical abortion “killer” robot, and vulgar signs, Students for Life of America (SFLA) remained undeterred in the face of opposition. Some of SFLA’s craziest moments became the media’s biggest hits. Read how SFLA’s SCOTUS Squad, students, and staff made waves at the U.S. Supreme Court and digitally across the nation.  

It’s not often that life and death arguments are headline news, but that was the case as the Supreme Court heard arguments in U.S. Food & Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine that examined whether Chemical Abortion Pills were approved for sale recklessly and with weak protections in place for the women and girls taking them. Making their separate cases were Solicitor

SFLA Joins the Rally at the Supreme Court as the FDA Faces the Justices Regarding their Handling of Dangerous Chemical Abortion Pills WASHINGTON D.C. (03-27-2024) – Students for Life of America Executive Vice President Tina Whittington will join the rally outside of the Supreme Court as U.S. Food & Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine is set to be argued over the approval of

MEDIA NOTE: BOTH EVENTS TAKING PLACE Tuesday, March 26, & Prayer Vigil at SCOTUS Monday, March 25.   “The Biden Administration has prioritized reckless distribution of Chemical Abortion Pills, without regard for the women made vulnerable to abusers and exposed to injury, infertility, and even death,” noted SFLA’s Kristan Hawkins. “The abortion extremists did not take time to check on whether

Science is science no matter the publication, right? Not so fast. A growing controversy is building in abortion-friendly outlets claiming that research from those who have expressed concern for mothers and their preborn children needs to be disqualified. What is at stake is a Supreme Court case that asks about how harmful ARE abortions from Chemical Abortion Pills.   As soon

A recently filed pro-abortion lawsuit in the state of Kentucky has got us experiencing serious déjà vu, and we can’t be the only ones. An anonymous woman has sued to have the right to abort her child in the Bluegrass State, and the whole thing is eerily similar to a landmark abortion decision: the infamous and recently reversed Roe v.

“The abortion extremists in the Biden Administration through the FDA deliberately allow women to be exposed to injury, infertility, death, and abusers with their online distribution scheme, and with the Biden regulation changes, we also have government-sanctioned, corporate dumping of medical waste into our waterways,” said Students for Life’s Kristan Hawkins. “Even if you support abortion, that’s no argument in

October is upon us, and there’s more than just pumpkin spice lattes to be excited about — the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has just opened its term for 2023! Right now, SCOTUS is issuing order lists, which means the Justices are granting or denying reviewing the cases that have been brought before them. Students for Life of

In news that will probably shock no one (but make Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina extremely happy) the manufacturer of Mifepristone, a Chemical Abortion drug, has asked the Supreme Court to ensure continued access. As reported by The Hill:   “The conservative judges ruled the FDA acted improperly when it said mifepristone can be used up to 10 weeks of pregnancy rather than seven, allowed the